![]() |
|||
|
In this edition of our FTC Trust news flash, we look at a wide range of developments in the Dutch and EU tax legislation. From a further decrease of the Dutch corporate income tax rate to an EU proposition for a Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base. Also we will discuss the importance of the so called Bilateral Investment Treaties for the protection of foreign investments and inform you of the abolition of the Declaration of Non-Objection. Abolition of the Declaration of Non-Objection
The preventive control as materialized in the Declaration of Non-Objection, will be replaced with a new system of continuous control. Besides BV’s and NV’s also other legal entities, such as foundations, cooperatives, branches of foreign legal entities, will be subject to the new control system. Tax Agenda
New regulations (2012) regarding the request for an extension for filing of the tax return
In case the 2009 tax return has not been timely filed, it is important to file the 2010 and 2011 tax return on time as the Dutch tax authorities will otherwise deny the request for an extension for filing of the 2012 tax return. Dutch Tax Treaty Policy 2011
The Netherlands consistently seeks to agree on exclusive resident state taxation for participations (of in general 10% or more) and endeavors to expand its treat network to (more) developing countries. Dividends Interest and royalties Capital gains EU: Common Tax Base
The proposed Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (CCCTB), would mean that companies would benefit from a “one-stop-shop” system for filing their tax returns and would be able to consolidate all the profits and losses they incur across the EU. Member states would maintain their full sovereign right to set their own corporate tax rate. Instead of complying with different rules in each Member State, a company or a qualifying group of companies would have to comply with just one EU system for computing its taxable income. The proposal now needs to be discussed and agreed by Member States in Council, following the opinion of the European Parliament. Protection of foreign investments: Bilateral Investment Treaties
Because of the growing worldwide political instability and the threats by hostile government that international companies experience, it is getting more important to overlook the protections that Bilateral Investment Treaties (BIT’s) offers. A good example is the ExxonMobil case with assets in Venezuela. ExxonMobil was able to freeze USD 12 billion of Venezuela’s state owned oil company’s assets after claiming the protection of the Netherlands – Venezuela BIT. However the arbitration is still pending, it is clearly that BIT protection is worth to take into consideration when structuring future or existing foreign investments. A BIT is a treaty between two states establishing terms and conditions for the protection of investors of one state and their investments in the other state. Besides the fact that the Netherlands is a favorable holding jurisdiction, it also has a large number of investor friendly BIT’s. Furthermore, the Netherlands BIT’s generally offer the protection for indirect investments made by a Netherlands company through local subsidiaries. |
|||
|
|||
| . |
|
||